Civil
Disobedience
Starting
early from the 19th century until even to the late 20th
century there had been many acts of civil disobedience and people that spoke
different views on it. A small group of enlightened minds rose independently
across the globe, and chartered a new course for political and social
reformation. The injustices that were existent had caused people to rise up and
speak out against it. Starting from Henry David Thoreau to Martin Luther King
Jr., there had been many accounts on civil disobedience. These speakers, such
as Martin Luther King Jr, have been inspired and influenced from ideas of
others to commit to their own ideas and logics. Gandhi also had a lot to do with
this movement along with Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. Gandhi’s movement
for independence set the forefront of civil disobedience and he courageously
complied with arbitrary laws in order to be defiant. Aware of the destruction
that lay ahead from the path of violence, Gandhi employed self- abrasive and
nonviolent tactics to prove the yoke of empire the indefatigable resolve of his
people and their thirst for justice. These leaders of nonviolent protest
permanently changed the world viewed organized resistance and effectively
spread the ideas of fighting inequality. Speaking and writing down what they
had to say, these philosophies on this movement had spread.
From early 19th century, Henry David Thoreau
had started to rebel against his state. He argued for the people and the rights
of individuals against government and unfair treatment. It was a form of
injustice to allow someone to take control of another person’s life in a way
that the person was not pleased or hurt. He refused to pay his tax to the state
because of his view on America’s war with Mexico and on slave territory.
Therefore, he was sent to jail for one night. In prison, an inspiration of an
essay called ‘Resistance to Civil Government’ had been formed and it consisted
of all his different views and logics. In 1866 many of his great lectures were
published and the word about civil disobedience had begun to grow with
relations to the topics of slavery and the Mexican American War. To Thoreau,
civil disobedience as of utmost importance when necessary and to him even if it
meant being isolated from society or going into prison. A quote from his essay
in 1849 was, “The government is best which governs least which shows his
attitude towards the government and also the motive for as to why civil
disobedience may be permitted and supported. Part of his drive to encourage
civil disobedience was his disapproval of slavery and the Mexican American War.
He believed in the right of an individual rather than a government or even a
majority. He had a bad judgment towards governments in which he resulted that
they cause a lot more harm than they do good and therefore they are unjust,
democracy or not. There was also a paradox in his thinking, for there was a
view that showed that Thoreau wanted to withdraw from life and all its hard
questions. There was also another view that Thoreau’s action was the logical
outcome of his beliefs.
Moving on from the 19th century to the 20th
century, Mohandas K. Gandhi became a huge symbol of rights for everyone and of
nonviolence, even when the opponent was violently attacking. He fought for the
rights of Indians under a racist government in South Africa. He influenced the
Hindus to always hold nonviolent principles even in the face of violent tactics
by those in power. He fought desperately but yet ineffectively failed. It says
in his speech ‘On Nonviolent Resistance’ that “there are two ways of countering
injustice” (244). One could either be really violent or attack or one could use
the method called ‘satyagraha’ which is basically being prepared to die in
suffering to create peace. He also stated “Civil disobedience is the inherent
right of a citizen to be civil, implies discipline, thought, care, attention
and sacrifice.” Similar to Thoreau, Gandhi also agreed with the terms of civil
disobedience as he explains that people are born with the right to protest in
civil ways that applies care and thought. He brought attention to the fact that
the people have a right to be displeased with their rulers when their actions
are not satisfactory to them and when so, they have the right to protest
against their power. He was known for his nonviolent ways and his ways still
bring impact upon modern society and culture as his image thrives among us. He
stressed peace so much to die rather than hurt the opposing party at fault. His
actions and ideals on peace and the just way of countering injustice in
nonviolent ways is admired by many and is truly one of the greatest examples of
civil disobedience in history. Gandhi was able to undermine the imperial
government to the point of acquiescence.
Martin Luther King Jr. influenced from ideas of both
Thoreau and Gandhi was really dedicated to his cause and fought against
injustice and racism. He, like Gandhi, supported his philosophy on nonviolent
resistance and always spoke out on his news on the law and the injustice of it.
He would say how if one was to break an unfair law, one would need to do it
“openly, lovingly” (246) and not haltingly. He would say how there were “two
types of law: just and unjust” and it was up to the people to know how to deal
with it. Martin Luther King Jr. argued between the difference of a law that was
just and unjust. He stated that a just law was one that abided by the morals of
the law of God and an unjust law was one that did not. For instance the right
to vote for African Americans in the United States which Dr. King argued unfair
him. He spoke out on the morals of the laws and the fair treatment of people
without discrimination towards their color, background, or ethnicity. Martin
Luther King Jr., like Gandhi, promoted paths of nonviolence. On October 14,
1964 he received the Nobel Peace for his achievements fighting racial
inequality through nonviolent peaceful methods. It was the idea that those who
were treated unfairly had the right to stand up for what they believe in and
take action towards that course.
For eons, oppression and tyranny were met with an equal
and opposite force of violence. The only logical reaction to murder was murder
itself. However a small group of enlightened minds gathers and rose to create a
new course for political and social reformation. In particular, Henry David
Thoreau, Mohandas K. Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr. all spoke out on the
idea of civil disobedience and the logic of all these injustices happening on
the world. They were only a few of the many who have stood up to corruption,
power, and majority of thought throughout history. Civil disobedience, though,
is not of the past and it is an action which is still practiced today. With
better examples before us, civil disobedience can be practiced in a better
manner today. There were paradoxical views on the breaking of unjust laws and
also views on nonviolent tactics about civil disobedience. As long as there is
greed, crime, and corruption, civil disobedience will always stand up for the
rights of the people.
Essay is pretty good but use of some words should be reevaluated. First paragraph needs to be tidied up.
ReplyDeleteYou have a pretty adequate essay here Benjamin. I agree with Kevin that use of some words might be more effective if used differently thought. The flow of the essay in general is pretty smooth overall and helps give a better read. Great conclusion paragraph. I like the way you accumulated everything and summed it up into a nice conclusion.
ReplyDeleteOffering differing perspectives in a historical essay like this is always important. Good analysis of the varying civil disobedience that took place across different parts of the world. In addition, comparing and contrasting these different perspectives offers a much more holistic experience to the reader.
ReplyDelete